No items found.

PEP Library
Thought Leadership

Policy, Power & Powertrains: The U.S. Automotive Sector Conundrum

Full Post
This report dives into U.S. policy, its appetite for new power to promote data centers and AI growth, and the downstream impacts that has on the automotive industry and their powertrain choices.

This report dives into U.S. policy, its appetite for new power to promote data centers and AI growth, and the downstream impacts that has on the automotive industry and their powertrain choices. In 2025, the new U.S. administration took aim at policies that impact energy availability. The U.S. EPA has started the process to dismantle existing state-level and federal level greenhouse gas standards. We foresee that this current administration will continue to make significant changes until the 2026 midterms. Enacted policy, by that point, will remain in place until 2030 at the earliest. Automotive manufacturers and their supply chain typically work on 6-8 year product life-cycles which requires stable and predictable regulatory outcomes. Right now they are challenged to move forward in the face of uncertainty.

Key takeaways:

  1. Power, policy, and a compute-first decade - AI capacity, and the firm power to feed it, has become a national-interest priority. As a result, transportation and heavy industry act as policy-takers while Washington focuses on AI and grid build-out. Near-term decarbonization favors fast-to-deploy, grid-compatible options (hybrids, flexible platforms, behind-the-meter storage) over single-path bets.
  2. Power constraints are the bottleneck - Data centers use ~9% of U.S. generating capacity (vs. ~5% U.K., ~2.3% China). Interconnection queues are congested, ~80% of capacity withdraws before COD, and mean queue times are extreme; “first-ready, first-served” rules favor the best-capitalized buyers. This is driving moves to low-cost jurisdictions and even self-owned generation, with multi-billion-dollar cost spreads by location.
  3. Deregulation is the base case; compliance becomes investor-driven. Federal actions tilt toward deregulation: removal of EV purchase credits, suspended CAFE penalties, eased O&G oversight, and CRA rollbacks. The EPA GHG endangerment framework is targeted for removal by the 2026 midterms, with no realistic replacement before 2030. Boards should plan for a multi-year regime prioritizing cheap, reliable power and verifiable emissions reductions delivered by industry.
  4. Auto outlook - Electrification grows, unevenly, so hedge bets against a single powertrain choice. ICE will persist for at least two decades; hybrids compound share and must grow faster; BEV growth remains sensitive to policy durability, charging build-out, and cost parity. The U.S. sits near 8% BEV share through Q3-2025 versus much steeper MY27-32 targets, implying missed compliance without major shifts. The EU pushes toward a 2035 ICE sales ban while China remains the outlier (NEV >50%, BEV >30%) amid overcapacity and price wars; avoid single-pathway bets.

Policy, Power & Powertrains: The U.S. Automotive Sector Conundrum

Timeframe

Add to calendar

Location

No items found.

Connect

No items found.

Sponsored

PEP Library

Explore Our Latest Insights

Visit page
Visit Library post
The prospect of a cease-fire between the U.S. and Iran drove oil prices and energy stocks lower Wednesday as traders anticipated at least a temporary respite for markets.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Dan Pickering, Founder and CIO of Pickering Energy Partners, says that Iran is loathe to give up its leverage on the Strait of Hormuz, and that until loaded ships move out of the Strait and empty ships move in, any solution remains temporary. He says that oil prices will likely hover around $70 to $90 per barrel.
Visit page
Visit Library post
The Iran war calls for a fundamental rethink of a sector that investors had shunned for years
Visit page
Visit Library post
Jonathan Ferro, Lisa Abramowicz and Annmarie Hordern speak daily with leaders and decision makers from Wall Street to Washington and beyond. No other program better positions investors and executives for the trading day.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Experts warn Iran’s influence over the Strait of Hormuz could disrupt energy flows, elevate oil prices, and create lasting global economic consequences.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Dan Pickering of Pickering Energy Partners On Global Oil Prices
Visit page
Visit Library post
Dan Pickering of Pickering Energy Partners On Global Oil Prices
Visit page
Visit Library post
Dan Pickering of Pickering Energy Partners warns that tighter oil supply could spark hoarding, pushing prices higher and setting the stage for demand destruction if the conflict drags on.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Dan Pickering, founder and CIO of Pickering Energy Partners, discusses the oil industry.
Visit page
Visit Library post
It is time to be more optimistic about oil markets and energy stocks.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Surging oil and LNG prices tied to the Iran conflict have pushed U.S. energy stocks to record highs, benefiting companies like Exxon, Chevron, and major refiners even as broader markets decline.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Rising oil prices driven by the Middle East conflict are increasing profits for U.S. oil producers, but uncertainty over how long the price surge will last is making companies cautious about expanding production.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Escalating tensions involving Iran have sharply reduced tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route that carries roughly 20% of the world’s oil supply.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Dan Pickering, founder and CIO of Pickering Energy Partners, discusses the impact of Middle East tensions on global energy markets.
Visit page
Visit Library post
A joint U.S. and Israeli attack on Iran killed its supreme leader and ignited wider regional conflict, yet crude oil prices rose by a relatively muted ~6% on March 2.
Ready to get started?
Contact our specialized teams at PEP for more information.