No items found.

PEP Library
Thought Leadership

Policy, Power & Powertrains: The U.S. Automotive Sector Conundrum

Full Post
This report dives into U.S. policy, its appetite for new power to promote data centers and AI growth, and the downstream impacts that has on the automotive industry and their powertrain choices.

This report dives into U.S. policy, its appetite for new power to promote data centers and AI growth, and the downstream impacts that has on the automotive industry and their powertrain choices. In 2025, the new U.S. administration took aim at policies that impact energy availability. The U.S. EPA has started the process to dismantle existing state-level and federal level greenhouse gas standards. We foresee that this current administration will continue to make significant changes until the 2026 midterms. Enacted policy, by that point, will remain in place until 2030 at the earliest. Automotive manufacturers and their supply chain typically work on 6-8 year product life-cycles which requires stable and predictable regulatory outcomes. Right now they are challenged to move forward in the face of uncertainty.

Key takeaways:

  1. Power, policy, and a compute-first decade - AI capacity, and the firm power to feed it, has become a national-interest priority. As a result, transportation and heavy industry act as policy-takers while Washington focuses on AI and grid build-out. Near-term decarbonization favors fast-to-deploy, grid-compatible options (hybrids, flexible platforms, behind-the-meter storage) over single-path bets.
  2. Power constraints are the bottleneck - Data centers use ~9% of U.S. generating capacity (vs. ~5% U.K., ~2.3% China). Interconnection queues are congested, ~80% of capacity withdraws before COD, and mean queue times are extreme; “first-ready, first-served” rules favor the best-capitalized buyers. This is driving moves to low-cost jurisdictions and even self-owned generation, with multi-billion-dollar cost spreads by location.
  3. Deregulation is the base case; compliance becomes investor-driven. Federal actions tilt toward deregulation: removal of EV purchase credits, suspended CAFE penalties, eased O&G oversight, and CRA rollbacks. The EPA GHG endangerment framework is targeted for removal by the 2026 midterms, with no realistic replacement before 2030. Boards should plan for a multi-year regime prioritizing cheap, reliable power and verifiable emissions reductions delivered by industry.
  4. Auto outlook - Electrification grows, unevenly, so hedge bets against a single powertrain choice. ICE will persist for at least two decades; hybrids compound share and must grow faster; BEV growth remains sensitive to policy durability, charging build-out, and cost parity. The U.S. sits near 8% BEV share through Q3-2025 versus much steeper MY27-32 targets, implying missed compliance without major shifts. The EU pushes toward a 2035 ICE sales ban while China remains the outlier (NEV >50%, BEV >30%) amid overcapacity and price wars; avoid single-pathway bets.

Policy, Power & Powertrains: The U.S. Automotive Sector Conundrum

Timeframe

Add to calendar

Location

No items found.

Connect

No items found.

Sponsored

PEP Library

Explore Our Latest Insights

Visit page
Visit Library post
Visit page
Visit Library post
Visit page
Visit Library post
US maritime patrols are shifting control of the Strait of Hormuz, as vessels increasingly use the Omani route despite continued threats from Iran.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Iran’s proposed Strait of Hormuz fee system could generate billions annually, reshape Gulf security, and permanently alter global energy markets.
Visit page
Visit Library post
We are enthusiastic dip buyers, while refusing to be rally sellers.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Visit page
Visit Library post
Oil and gas companies are expected to report enormous profit growth as the war in Iran drives energy prices higher, but their stocks continue to underperform because investors question whether those gains will last. Political sensitivity and uncertainty around oil prices may also make companies reluctant to immediately increase dividends or stock buybacks.
Visit page
Visit Library post
President Trump initially celebrated rising oil prices because they boosted U.S. energy profits. However, after the Iran war pushed crude prices from roughly $66 to an average of $95 per barrel between March and June, oil companies and their allies are now poised to receive major financial gains. The situation has become politically inconvenient for Trump, who is no longer pleased with the consequences of the price surge.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Iran’s renewed threat to the Strait of Hormuz leaves Trump facing a stark choice as oil reserves shrink, fuel prices rise, and the conflict escalates.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Oil prices climb as cracks in the U.S.-Iran cease-fire, renewed Hormuz tensions, and potential strikes revive volatility in global energy markets.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Voting machine vs. weighing machine. The voting machine is winning.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Visit page
Visit Library post
Visit page
Visit Library post
The global oil market has avoided the catastrophic supply crunch many feared when the Iran war broke out, but it’s far from balanced.
Visit page
Visit Library post
Fitch Ratings upgraded its oil and gas sector outlook to “improving” from “neutral,” and Moody’s maintained its positive outlook.
Ready to get started?
Contact our specialized teams at PEP for more information.